33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives with the police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, assure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender as well as the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, Nevertheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The main objectives of police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all make certain legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Stacy, a tenant in the duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not provided her sufficient notice before raising her rent, citing a new state law that demands a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that the new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done In the event the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Obviously distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion includes a transfer to the higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, within the other hand, gives financial relief by inserting an employee in a very higher pay scale, without altering their job duties or position. It's a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained in the same spend scale for an extended time, particularly when they absence prospects for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Resource used to alleviate the hardship of lengthy-term stagnation. Read more
Because the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, when it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it's actually very imprecise about whether the ninety-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the ninety-working day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities topic to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also make sure regard of your family lose in accordance with regulation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they are able to act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become attained. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of in the terms stated earlier mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a law that is based on precedents, that will be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
The law of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called law of necessity..
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section twenty with the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and include all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion is not really alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service framework however it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it truly is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may more info possibly if glad that a civil servant who was entitled for being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province in the higher post, direct that such civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.